ABOUT A BOY by Nick Hornby
When writing, your goal is to not only think about yourself but what will draw in your readers, a dramatic or action packed beginning can work in movies, most of the time in literature if there is too much happening right off the bat, surprisingly you will lose interest. What intrigues me to continue reading to the end of this novel is Hornby's opening scene; the moments after a breakup. As I said, dramatic and action packed could sound like the way to go, but it's the authentic drama that we readers are looking for. When people are breaking up, their emotions are running wild and melodrama will often take over. When we come in, it's all over and now we are going to watch real people not being fueled by their hormones. Marcus' mother and Roger had a big argument that he says "he hadn't understood a word of it," so how could a reader? Also, physically it is easier to write less. Eavesdropping on the breakup would tell us about the couple, we don't need to know Roger. The aftermath dialogue gives good background to Marcus' facts and character traits. Mainly, that he loves his mother and when she's upset "he ought to say something optimistic."
The narrative is present in this novel to only tell us what could not be shown by character action or speech, it describes the people and lets the reader read about them. It is fueled by English diction, filled with slang terms that we don't find in Canada. The voice of this narration is looking through similar eyes as Marcus the kid; he name drops popular children's movies of that time as well as his opinion on them, and the most interesting characteristic is the attention span. "And that when she was his age... something, he couldn't remember what."
The ending of this chapter is not as much of a segway into the next chapter as it is more enchanting narrative. Marcus' mother is depressed after ending another relationship, she feels alone and unwanted, her son turns on the 'tele' and hopes to find something that won't get her mind on her being single; he "zapped" to the channel programming "a sort of fish thing that lived right down at the bottom of caves and couldn't see anything, a fish that nobody could see the point of; he didn't think that would remind his mum of anything much." The naivete is humorous. A light-hearted way to end the introduction.
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
I.S.P BLOG #1
WHAT HAPPENED LATER by Ray Robertson
The first chapter of this novel is efficiently opens the story. Within pages two buddy characters Jack and Stanley are revealed, within paragraphs we know their favorite pub, and within sentences we see that Jack is a comical drunk. Despite the happy-go-lucky alcoholism and a moocher friend antics, Kerouac is more than just a buffoon. We learn more through the omniscient narrative than the direct speech; I do not frown upon Robertson telling us what he could show us because being a protagonist being dragged off the road after a drunken adventure still sauced as a pan, is not where I would expect to hear:
"Say Jack?"
"Yes Stanley?"
"How is life as French-Catholic-Writer going?"
"Not too bad at all my studio apartment friend!"
Since there isn't going to be any dialogue worth keeping in the story, it is appropriate we learn the facts above through the author's storytelling which enchants with his style.
Immediately establishing the skeleton's of the characters, the drive that resonates is that we are left to fill in the blanks of his/her personality; we are comfortable with him being a drunk yet we want to know Jack as a person.
The direct speech uses no quotation marks, it is italicized; the author credits the reader with knowledge by expecting him to understand also, this is a small technique used to keep the flow of the reading steady allowing a reader to watch the story in his mind. There are well chosen words that stick out and emphasize the other words that they're tied to. Jack is a "soggy drunk" and will eventually get the "crippling hangover" that he is used to.
"Well, there is Jack Kerouac, back on the road again." It feels like I am overhearing this story at "Gunther's Fisherman's bar" with the mates exchanging light hearted stories about themselves. The tone of the narrative sounds from the perspective of Stanley the reliable friend ("Stanley tried everything: reasoning, pleading, even threatening.") or Jack the writer ("how much money what's-his-name's agent got for him for his last paperback reprint deal.")
The first chapter of this novel is efficiently opens the story. Within pages two buddy characters Jack and Stanley are revealed, within paragraphs we know their favorite pub, and within sentences we see that Jack is a comical drunk. Despite the happy-go-lucky alcoholism and a moocher friend antics, Kerouac is more than just a buffoon. We learn more through the omniscient narrative than the direct speech; I do not frown upon Robertson telling us what he could show us because being a protagonist being dragged off the road after a drunken adventure still sauced as a pan, is not where I would expect to hear:
"Say Jack?"
"Yes Stanley?"
"How is life as French-Catholic-Writer going?"
"Not too bad at all my studio apartment friend!"
Since there isn't going to be any dialogue worth keeping in the story, it is appropriate we learn the facts above through the author's storytelling which enchants with his style.
Immediately establishing the skeleton's of the characters, the drive that resonates is that we are left to fill in the blanks of his/her personality; we are comfortable with him being a drunk yet we want to know Jack as a person.
The direct speech uses no quotation marks, it is italicized; the author credits the reader with knowledge by expecting him to understand also, this is a small technique used to keep the flow of the reading steady allowing a reader to watch the story in his mind. There are well chosen words that stick out and emphasize the other words that they're tied to. Jack is a "soggy drunk" and will eventually get the "crippling hangover" that he is used to.
"Well, there is Jack Kerouac, back on the road again." It feels like I am overhearing this story at "Gunther's Fisherman's bar" with the mates exchanging light hearted stories about themselves. The tone of the narrative sounds from the perspective of Stanley the reliable friend ("Stanley tried everything: reasoning, pleading, even threatening.") or Jack the writer ("how much money what's-his-name's agent got for him for his last paperback reprint deal.")
Monday, July 7, 2008
Saturday, July 5, 2008
FALSEWORK by Gary Geddes
Three mo' poems...hoorah
GRAVITY, GRAVITAS
To me, the most interesting and best poems are the verses that are multiple elaborate stanzas of descriptions of a moment that lasts less than thirty seconds. Less than half the time it takes to read the piece. A story from some one affected by the tragedy of the bridge's collapse who I would most like to hear; someone who was a victim of the miscalculations. Geddes does marvelous work in illustrating the moment of the crash, and shows how much thought occurs during a few seconds.
Fear, instinct, faith. All a part of the emotions conveyed through the bridge workers' recollection. He thinks about his family, the science of how he will die, and accepting his death is the underlying feeling throughout all his instant brain patterns when he starts to fall. The one thing that saves him is himself knowing he can change his fate; he removes his heavy tool belt before it has time to sink him to the bottom of the lake. "No time for philosophy; no time for analysis. Simply, I'm going to die."
When your life flashes before your eyes, you realize all that matters and forget all that you're unsure about.
ROOTS OF HEAVEN
"How little it takes
to sever connections :a trigger,
a saw, a miscalculation."
A parent mourns for the loss of her son. The metaphor is clear and explained as part of the poem. A massacre of elephants at Lake Chad and the tragedy of the Second Narrows Bridge.
The mother becomes "that leathery beast bellowing her pain, trunk raking the the air for the scent ofher newborn." There is a connection between man and nature; caring for their children and how parents detail their worst nightmare as losing their children.
MOTT
I enjoy the diction in this piece especially. "fighting a capricious current, helmet smacking an impossibly bent girder, jungle of twisted steel, roller coaster to eternity." It is a good illustration of the dark and gloomy lake floor that the diver is working through. It's a tough job, alot of chances that one could die in that particular situation. Also, it's tough having to search for the dead. And that is portrayed in this poem. An encounter with an electric eel creates a tense moment in thie piece because we already know how delicate he must perform his task.
GRAVITY, GRAVITAS
To me, the most interesting and best poems are the verses that are multiple elaborate stanzas of descriptions of a moment that lasts less than thirty seconds. Less than half the time it takes to read the piece. A story from some one affected by the tragedy of the bridge's collapse who I would most like to hear; someone who was a victim of the miscalculations. Geddes does marvelous work in illustrating the moment of the crash, and shows how much thought occurs during a few seconds.
Fear, instinct, faith. All a part of the emotions conveyed through the bridge workers' recollection. He thinks about his family, the science of how he will die, and accepting his death is the underlying feeling throughout all his instant brain patterns when he starts to fall. The one thing that saves him is himself knowing he can change his fate; he removes his heavy tool belt before it has time to sink him to the bottom of the lake. "No time for philosophy; no time for analysis. Simply, I'm going to die."
When your life flashes before your eyes, you realize all that matters and forget all that you're unsure about.
ROOTS OF HEAVEN
"How little it takes
to sever connections :a trigger,
a saw, a miscalculation."
A parent mourns for the loss of her son. The metaphor is clear and explained as part of the poem. A massacre of elephants at Lake Chad and the tragedy of the Second Narrows Bridge.
The mother becomes "that leathery beast bellowing her pain, trunk raking the the air for the scent ofher newborn." There is a connection between man and nature; caring for their children and how parents detail their worst nightmare as losing their children.
MOTT
I enjoy the diction in this piece especially. "fighting a capricious current, helmet smacking an impossibly bent girder, jungle of twisted steel, roller coaster to eternity." It is a good illustration of the dark and gloomy lake floor that the diver is working through. It's a tough job, alot of chances that one could die in that particular situation. Also, it's tough having to search for the dead. And that is portrayed in this poem. An encounter with an electric eel creates a tense moment in thie piece because we already know how delicate he must perform his task.
ON WRITING by Stephen King
pp 178-200.
Another informing section of "Writing for Dummies." Here King's subject under his scrupulous magnifying glass is dialogue; "what gives your cast their voices."
What I've learned is that speech is a much more vivid than straight narration as way of conveying a character across to a reader and other characters. You can tell the reader, but showing him is better. And this creates a characters voice better; if you learn about the character by 'watching' him, you'll be driven to read on and learn more even though you'll eventually be able to predict what the character would think or say in given situations.
Dialogue is the most sensitive part of writing. Your style of writing comes naturally, and there is no extra thinking involved other than thinking like yourself; dialogue calls upon a much more artistic ability. What makes is sensitive is that a reader can smell foul and poor character development before he opens the book. "When dialogue is right, we know. When it's wrong we also know it jags on the ear like a badly tuned musical instrument." King provides good examples of dialogue and speech that makes people cringe.
My favorite point of this section is his views on profanity in literature, or as his mother put it "the language of the ignorant." If you're willing to substitute PG rated nouns in exchange for good ol' fashioned cussing, that isn't giving the authenticity of your character, unless he or she is like Stephen King's mother. "The point is to let each character speak freely, without regard to what the Legion of Decency or the Christian Ladies' Reading Circle may approve of."
Another informing section of "Writing for Dummies." Here King's subject under his scrupulous magnifying glass is dialogue; "what gives your cast their voices."
What I've learned is that speech is a much more vivid than straight narration as way of conveying a character across to a reader and other characters. You can tell the reader, but showing him is better. And this creates a characters voice better; if you learn about the character by 'watching' him, you'll be driven to read on and learn more even though you'll eventually be able to predict what the character would think or say in given situations.
Dialogue is the most sensitive part of writing. Your style of writing comes naturally, and there is no extra thinking involved other than thinking like yourself; dialogue calls upon a much more artistic ability. What makes is sensitive is that a reader can smell foul and poor character development before he opens the book. "When dialogue is right, we know. When it's wrong we also know it jags on the ear like a badly tuned musical instrument." King provides good examples of dialogue and speech that makes people cringe.
My favorite point of this section is his views on profanity in literature, or as his mother put it "the language of the ignorant." If you're willing to substitute PG rated nouns in exchange for good ol' fashioned cussing, that isn't giving the authenticity of your character, unless he or she is like Stephen King's mother. "The point is to let each character speak freely, without regard to what the Legion of Decency or the Christian Ladies' Reading Circle may approve of."
Wednesday, July 2, 2008
Three poems from FALSEWORK by Gary Geddes
PASSPORT
What happens after a war is a fantastic yet bewildering idea for people living through it. The story in this poem is told by a man immigrating to North America with the dream of the war ending realized. He describes warm settings; the American dream, what he wants for the good of his family, the family he wants to start in the new world. Geddes then shifts the tone after he builds compassion for the narration. The fantasy becomes reality when he is taken to the opposite of what he dreamed.
LADIES & ESCORTS
This poem creates a very enchanting voice of a 1950's construction worker. Geddes uses the diction of the character he has narrating authentically by bringing in the right words. "Bugger-all, gung-ho" as well as lingo that would be picked up from doing that kind of work. "Inserted a couple of pins to knock out as the choker tightened and the crane took up the weight." It tells a story well in a different style of poetry that is not as metaphorical or filled with a whack of triple meanings.
AN EDUCATED GUESS
I'm not entirely sure as to what the educated guess was. I like the story in the poem as it another view of the bridge before the tragedy and that gives a offset feeling to the reader; the dramatic irony is that we know something terrible is going to happen and the characters in this scene would never expect it to happen. Geddes does good work of creating a relationship between a reader and the protagonist. Him and Katie, his love interest, begin talking about the Sisteen Chapel in Rome, and I love the scene where he finally gets a kiss. She is a Fine Arts student and he's a steel worker; when she starts on about her appreciation for art and then he relates it to the only thing he knows, steel working. She finds his "venture" cute and gave him what he deserved
What happens after a war is a fantastic yet bewildering idea for people living through it. The story in this poem is told by a man immigrating to North America with the dream of the war ending realized. He describes warm settings; the American dream, what he wants for the good of his family, the family he wants to start in the new world. Geddes then shifts the tone after he builds compassion for the narration. The fantasy becomes reality when he is taken to the opposite of what he dreamed.
LADIES & ESCORTS
This poem creates a very enchanting voice of a 1950's construction worker. Geddes uses the diction of the character he has narrating authentically by bringing in the right words. "Bugger-all, gung-ho" as well as lingo that would be picked up from doing that kind of work. "Inserted a couple of pins to knock out as the choker tightened and the crane took up the weight." It tells a story well in a different style of poetry that is not as metaphorical or filled with a whack of triple meanings.
AN EDUCATED GUESS
I'm not entirely sure as to what the educated guess was. I like the story in the poem as it another view of the bridge before the tragedy and that gives a offset feeling to the reader; the dramatic irony is that we know something terrible is going to happen and the characters in this scene would never expect it to happen. Geddes does good work of creating a relationship between a reader and the protagonist. Him and Katie, his love interest, begin talking about the Sisteen Chapel in Rome, and I love the scene where he finally gets a kiss. She is a Fine Arts student and he's a steel worker; when she starts on about her appreciation for art and then he relates it to the only thing he knows, steel working. She finds his "venture" cute and gave him what he deserved
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
IN THE JUNGLE by Annie Dillard
"Out of the way of what?"
Annie Dillard's piece looks into another culture and details its beauty and the staggering differences between it and our country. The good thing about travel writing is that it's out to point out positive things that we do not experience in our culture so accompanied with good sensory detail, you can be involved in the best and most vivid 'telepathy' in reading.
Dillard's piece is a teleportation device. She makes good use of detail; her sensory description enlivens the piece in a way that allows a reader to have a picture of the scene in his mind, he can see the scene in his own mind and then watch it happen. There is intimate microscopic detail in her description of flora when she talks about tree trunks being "thirty or forty feet across." There is a variety of tree names which she learned and then teaches us, and fauna detail; there are many things in the rainforest I should be afraid of.
The local customs of the rainforest are another thing. There is a good value of shock that intrigues a reader. "Blowgun-using Indians, who killed missionaries in 1956 and ate them," "we saw where he had impaled the head of a boa, open-mouthed, on a pointed stick by the canoes, for decoration."
Also, her diction adds to her style. She has a good use of self explanatory verbs in describing "Herons, egrets, and cuckoos;" plodded, clattered, lolled and fussed.
Annie Dillard's piece looks into another culture and details its beauty and the staggering differences between it and our country. The good thing about travel writing is that it's out to point out positive things that we do not experience in our culture so accompanied with good sensory detail, you can be involved in the best and most vivid 'telepathy' in reading.
Dillard's piece is a teleportation device. She makes good use of detail; her sensory description enlivens the piece in a way that allows a reader to have a picture of the scene in his mind, he can see the scene in his own mind and then watch it happen. There is intimate microscopic detail in her description of flora when she talks about tree trunks being "thirty or forty feet across." There is a variety of tree names which she learned and then teaches us, and fauna detail; there are many things in the rainforest I should be afraid of.
The local customs of the rainforest are another thing. There is a good value of shock that intrigues a reader. "Blowgun-using Indians, who killed missionaries in 1956 and ate them," "we saw where he had impaled the head of a boa, open-mouthed, on a pointed stick by the canoes, for decoration."
Also, her diction adds to her style. She has a good use of self explanatory verbs in describing "Herons, egrets, and cuckoos;" plodded, clattered, lolled and fussed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)